The Chemical Composition of Some Marine Fishes from the Iraqi Marine Waters

 

Amjed K. Resen1, Dhia F. Alfekaiki2, Nada R. Othman1

1Department of Fisheries and Marine Resources, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Iraq.

2Department of Food Science, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Iraq.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: amjedkrr@yahoo.com

 

Abstract:

The current study was conducted during the period from October 2013 until September 2014 to estimate the chemical composition for three species of marine fish; Acanthopagru arabicus, Chelon subviridis and Cynoglossus arel. Higher percentage of fat in A. arabicus was recorded at spring (4.23%) while the lowest was in C. arel at summer (1.75%). Moisture acheived highest percentage in C. arel at summer with 79.14% and the lowest percentage was in A. arabicus at spring (70.8%). The results indicated an inverse relationship between moisture and fat contents with differences among seasons and the studied species. C. arel was characterized at autumn by the higher content of ash (8.1%). Protein content analysis showed no significant difference (P>0.05) except that between A. arabicus, with C. subviridis and C. arel, where. A. arabicus achieved the highest value atn spring (20.12%) and the lowest value was recorded for C. arel  at summer (14.18%).

 

KEY WORDS:

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

The amount of fish catch from capture fisheries and aquaculture was about 167 million tons in 2014, 146 million tons of it was devoted for human consumption which amounted to 20.1 kg per capita/ year (FAO, 2016). Fish is characterized by the high quality fish protein quality and quantity of essential amino acids and non-essential and the lack of connective tissue, which increases the digestion process (Islam and Joadder, 2005). Fat fish is considered from the finest animal fat to the high content of beneficial polyunsaturated fatty acids in maintaining human health from heart disease and hardening of the arteries, as well as they contain a good proportion of useful in human nutrition saturated fatty acids (Jahncke et al., 1988; Nettleton and Exler, 1992).

 

Many local studies that have focused on identifying the nutritional value of native fish in marine waters and freshwater recognize her seasonal changes as well as the content of amino acids and fatty acids (Hama and Kamel, 2012).

 

This study was aimed to compare the chemical composition of three marine fish species (Acanthopagrus arabicus, Chelon subviridis and Cynoglossus arel) which are widely consumed in the local markets of Basrah city, southern Iraq.

 

Materials and methods:

This study was conducted for the period from November 2013 to September 2014 on three marine fish species; A. arabicus, C. subviridis and C. arel. Fish were classified depending on Kuronuma and Abe (1986) and Carpenter et al. (1997). Samples were collected seasonally from the Iraqi marine waters north-west of the Arabian Gulf by local fishermen. Immediately after catch, fish has been placed in a container filled with crushed ice and transported to the laboratory.

 

Chemical Analysis:

1- Moisture: eestimated by the method mentioned in the A.O.A.C (2004). meat samples  oven dried at 105°C  for 24 hours then checked repeatedly until the weight is stabilized and moisture content was calculated according to the following equation:  

 

a= Sample weight with the vine before drying.

b= Sample weight with the vine after drying.

 

Protein:

Total nitrogen content was estimated according to Semi-microkjeldahl method described  in Pearson(1976). Taking the known limits of weight(0.5) gm, From each sample of fish, and then calculated by multiplying the value of the total protein nitrogen value in by  6.25 as in the following equation:

 

0.0014= Equivalent weight.

 

Lipid:

The lipid content was estimation using intermittent type Soxhlet device according to the  method described in A.O.A.C (2004). The solvent used was n-Hexane and the extracted lipid proportion was calculated using the following equation:

 

a= Sample weight with the paper before extraction.

b= Sample weight with the paper after extraction.

 

Ash:

Fish samples (1.5 gm) were incinerated into Muffle Furnace at 550°C for 12 h according to the method  described in A.O.A.C (2004). Ash content was calculated using the following equation:

 

a= Sample weight with the vine after incineration.

b= The vine Blank weight.

Data were analyzed statistically by using the statistical package of SPSS.

 

Results and discussion:

The results in table (3) Indicate mean weight and length of the fish species studied during the sampling period, as follows:

 

 

Table (1) weight and lengths of the fish studied

Mean total

weights (gm)

Mean total

lengths (cm)

Fish species

100-170

13-40

A. arabicus

50-120

19-35

C. subviridi

9-53

14-38

C. arel

 

Table (4) demonstrates the chemical composition of fish during the study period. The statistical analysis revealed no significant differences (P>0.05) in moisture contents between fish species. Highest moisture was recorded in C. arel during the summer (79.14%) while A. arabicus recorded the lowest moisture content amounted to 72.11% during autumn. This range is comparable to the moisture content in fish Tenualosa ilisha and Chirocentrus dorab (74.39% and 60.48% respectively) (Al Bayati, 1997; Al-Abdul-Nebi, 2003).   

 

Table (2). The chemical composition of fish A. arabicus.

Season

Moisture

Ash

Protein

Fat

Winter

73.87

3.49

19.25

3.22

Spring

70.8

4.16

20.12

4.23

Summer

75.32

3.11

19.24

2.14

Autumn

72.11

5.15

19.44

3.13

 

Table (3). The chemical composition of fish C. subviridis.

Season

Moisture

Ash

Protein

Fat

Winter

76.35

1.87

17.14

3.64

Spring

74.82

2.18

17.97

3.88

Summer

78.66

1.55

16.6

2.17

Autumn

75.7

1.79

18

2.64

 

Table (3). The chemical composition of fish C. arel.

Season

Moisture

Ash

Protein

Fat

Winter

76.22

6.34

15.17

1.48

Spring

75.2

7.18

15.79

1.79

Summer

79.14

4.73

14.18

1.4

Autumn

76

8.1

14.27

1.5

 

As for protein contents, no significant differences were observed (P>0.05) between examined fish. Fish A. arabicus recorded the highest percentage of protein (20.12%) during spring, while the lowest recorded protein percentage was 14.18% recorded in the C. arel. These results are comparable to protein content of Ilisha megalopteran 16.01% mentioned by Jasim and Al-Shatty (2002).

 

The nature of food have an effect on protein content in fish. Carnivorous fish gain more protein through diet thus have higher protein content. As indicated from the results in a table (2), no significant differences (P>0.05) were detected in lipid content between the studied species. Fish species A. arabicus showed the highest percentage of lipids (4.23 %) during the spring compared with lower lipid content recorded in the species C. arel (1.4%) during the summer. These results are compatible with the results in the study of Jasim and Al-Shatty (2002) where they recorded lipid content in Ilisha megaloptera within the range of 3.5- 4.52%. This may be due to the nature of feeding of the species and the abundance of food. Some species also showed existence of the inverse relationship between lipid and moisture (Jonsson, 2007). The increase in the lipid content in fish is often accompanied by a decrease in the percentage of moisture and vice versa. This variation may exist because of the different species and the season as well as the migration of some fish and consuming lipids as an energy source for migration purposes and reproduction leaving high moisture contents.

 

Statistical analysis shows significant differences (P<0.05) in ash contents between the studied fish species. Highest content was recorded in C. arel (7.18%) during spring while the lowest percentage was recorded in C. subviridis (1.55%) during summer. These results are higher than those detected in L. megaloptera as studied by Hnadi et al. (2001) and Jasim and Al-Shatty (2002) which amounted to 3.27% and 1.19%, respectively. The marine environment where fish are live could affect the ash content compared to freshwater due to the higher content of mineral elements as suggested by Al- Shatty (2006).

 

The statistical analysis of moisture content in the fish A. arabicus showed no significant differences (P>0.05) between seasons except for spring with the summer where significant differences (P <0.05) were detected. There are also significant differences in lipid, ash and protein contents during the seasons of the year. The study of Al-Mudhafr (2009) which indicated that fresh fish A. arabicus contained 71.43 % moisture, 4.1% fat and 20.35 % protein is comparable to the results of the current study, except for ash which amounted to 1.4% and was lower than the percentage of ash.

 

In C. subviridis, the statistical analysis showed no significant differences (P>0.05) in moisture content except for the spring with the autumn, where differences are significant (P <0.05). The ash, protein and lipid contents showed no significant differences (P> 0.05) between seasons as indicated by statistical analysis. Al Bayati and Abdul Rahim (2009) studied the chemical composition of  mullet fish which contained 18.7% protein, 1.5 % Ash, 76.6% moisture and 2.9% lipid. Their results were comparable to the results of the current study during year seasons. From the statistical analysis, it was indicated that the species C. arel  showed no significant differences (P> 0.05) in moisture and protein contents, while lipid content showed significant differences (P> 0.05) between seasons except for winter with both summer and autumn and for summer with autumn.

 

References:

1.        Al Bayati, M.M. (1997). Separation of protein and the main and constriction from chiroenrres dorab and study chemical composition and functional properties of the product. MSc. Thesis, Agriculture College, Basrah University, 77p.

2.        Al Bayati, M.M. and Ahmed, B.A. (2009). Albumin preparation and study of mullet fish chemical composition and functional properties. J. Res. Diyala Humanity, 32: 242-254.

3.        Al- Shatty, S.H (2006). Technological, chemical and microbial study on smoking, drying of four common marine fish species in Basrsh. Ph.D. Thesis, Agriculture College, Basrah University, 248p.

4.        Al-Abdul-Nebi, S.A. (2003). Separation and Identification of some fish proteins by gel filtration chromatography and electrophoresis and studying their functional properties. MSc. Thesis, Agriculture College, Basrah University, 70p.

5.        Ali, T.S. (1993). Composition and seasonal fluctuations of fish assemblage in the Northwest Arabian Gulf, Iraq. Mar. Mesopot., 8(1): 119-135.

6.        Al-Mudhafr, A. Habeeb, W. (2009). Enrichment of Laboratorial breads with protein concentrated manufacturing from Acanthopagrus latus fish using mutual method (Enzymatic- Physical). Kufa J. Agri. Sci., 1(1): 23-33.

7.        Altai, M. A. and AlMousawi, Um AlBashar, H.J. (1992). Practical meat and fish technology, Agriculture College, Basrah University, 142p.

8.        AOAC. (2000). Official Method of Analysis of AOAC International. Washington: Association of Analytical Chemists. 17 Ed., Vol. II.

9.        Blaber, S.J.M. (1987). Factors effecting recruitment and survival of Mugilide in estuaries and Coastal waters Southeastern Africa American Fisher. Socity Symposium, 1: 507-518p.

10.      Bligh, E.G. and Dyer, W.J. (1959). Arapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Pysiol. 37: 911.

11.      Carpenter, K.E.; Krupp, F.; Jones, D.A. and Zajons, U. (1997). FAO species identification guide for fishery purposes. The living marine resources of Kuwait, Eastern Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. Rome, FAO, 293p.

12.      F.A.O, (2016). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy

13.      Hama, M. J and Kamel,F. M. (2013) Chemical composition of five fresh water fish species which speared in dukan lake. J Tikrit Uni. Agr. Sci. 13(1):1-6.

14.      Hnadi, J.M; Hassan, R.S.; Al –Shatty S.N. (2001). Quality criteria of fresh Carp, Sbour, chemical indices changes during iced storage at 4°C . J. Agua. Res., 5(1).

15.      Hussain, N.A.; Mohamed; A.R.M.; Younis, K.H. and Multluk, F.M. (1999). The Biology of Bathygobius fuscus (Ruppell) at the intertidal mudflats. Mar. Mesopot., 14(1): 119-132.

16.      Hussain, N.A.; Naama, A.K. (1989). Survey of fish founa of khor AL-Zabair ,North-West Arabian Gulf, Mar. Mesopot., 4: 16197p.

17.      Hussain, S. M. (1990). Biology of psettodes erumei and Pseudorhambus arsius from the Northern Arabian sea. Indian J. Fish. 37(1): 63-66.

18.      Islam, M.N. and Joadder, M.N.R. (2005). Seaoonal variation of the proximate composition of freshwater Gobi, Glossogobius giuris (Hamilton) from the River padma. Pak. J. Bio. Sci., 8(4):532-536.

19.      Jahncke, M.; Hale, M.B.; Gooch, J.A. and Hopkins, J.S. (1988). Comparison of pond raised and wild red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) with respect to proximate composition, fatty acid profiles and sensory evaluations. J. Food Sci., 53: 286-287.

20.      Jasim, M.A.; Al-Shatty, S.M. (2002). Quality Assessment of Jewelled (Hisha megaloptera) Stored in ice by using sensory chemical and Microbiological indices. J. Mar. Mesopot., 7(1):191-207.

21.      Jonsson, A.; Finnbogadottir, G.A.; Porkelsson, G.; Magnusson, H.; Reykdal, O. and Arason, S. (2007). Dried fish as health. Matis Food Research, Innovation and safety, Report no. 32-37, Project no. 1707, ISSN: 1670-7192, 22p.

22.      Kuronuma, K and Abe, Y. (1986). Fishes of the Arabian Gulf. Kuwait Instute for Scientific Research, Kuwait, 356 P.

23.      Nettleton, J.A. and Exler, J. (1992). Nutrients in wild and farmed fish and shellfish. J. Food Sci., 57: 257-260.

24.     Pearson, D. (1976). The chemical analysis of foods, 7th ed. Churchill Living stone, London.

 

 

 

 

Received on 01.01.2017       Modified on 24.02.2017

Accepted on 25.03.2017      ©A&V Publications All right reserved

Research J. Science and Tech. 2017; 9(2): 231-233.

DOI: 10.5958/2349-2988.2017.00041.9